The NOVA Knowledge Centre for Business, Human Rights and the Environment
The NOVA Knowledge Centre for Business, Human Rights and the Environment (NOVA BHRE) is an innovative and multidisciplinary academic centre within the Nova School of Law. It was founded by its current director Claire Bright, and is supported by a team composed of experts both from NOVA School of Law and NOVA School of Business & Economics (NOVA SBE) as well as external experts from all around the world.
The main goal of the NOVA BHRE is to foster responsible business conduct that upholds respect for human rights, decent work and environmental standards throughout their entire global value chains, thereby also advancing the UN Sustainable Development Goals. The centre is focused on applied academic work, which puts the latest academic research directly into practice, and clarifies the role of law in corporate sustainability.
News
-
NOVA BHRE Newsletter July 2026
Upcoming events, activities, publications and blog posts.
-
NOVA BHRE Newsletter June 2026
Upcoming events, activities, publications and blog posts.
-
NOVA BHRE Newsletter May 2026
Upcoming events, activities, publications and blog posts.
Our latest blog post
-
The Yves Rocher Judgment: Key Lessons for Corporate Vigilance and Civil Liability
On 12 March 2026, the Paris Judicial Court (34th Civil Chamber) issued a landmark judgment in the developing case law on the French Duty of Vigilance Law.
The Yves Rocher ruling builds on the approach developed in the La Poste litigation, following the injunction issued by the Paris Judicial Court on 5 December 2023 and upheld by the Paris Court of Appeal on 17 June 2025. It also takes the case law a significant step further: for the first time, a French parent company was held civilly liable and ordered to compensate harm resulting from shortcomings in its vigilance plan. While La Poste clarified what an adequate vigilance plan should contain, Yves Rocher addresses the consequences of failing to meet those requirements.
In this blog post, we examine the main lessons that can be drawn from the Yves Rocher decision and consider what its implications are for civil liability under the French Duty of Vigilance Law.



